Comparative essay describing the ethics of Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas Essay

Philosophers live and encourage others to live according to the rules of concrete wisdom. Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas were three philosophers who sorted out heterogeneous h mavinst approaches. They investigated complex homophile sourions and theorized what is the estimable thing to do. For instance, Aristotle contemplated the aim of human deportment, Kant observed duty and bargain from respect for the law, and Levinas examined integritys responsibility to the Other. These unique points of view stand different answers regarding the search for the level-headed.In addition to their differences, these philosophers ar bound together by confusable estimates. For example, each of the philosophers believed in optimism they thought that only homo are naturally ethical. In addition, each of the philosophers believed in using priming to be ethical. They emphasized the concept of living rise up and proceeding well by using virtuous habits and better compo nent to reach the good. Furthermore, they all believed in self actualization in other words, ethically being the best one can be. They all thought an ethical person must be rational and responsible for their actions.They proposed that each person has a duty towards others and society. Aristotle lived during the B. C. era and established the concept of teleological ethics. This gist that ethics has a purpose or a reason. He distressed the concept of doctrine of the mean maintaining balance in ones actions. Additionally, he theorized the idea of developing virtuous habits to build good character as well as that happiness is the main goal of all human beings. He explained how reaching ones potential by living well and acting well will ultimately take aim to happiness.Moreover, he stated one should base ones actions on reason and he introduced the concept that reason controls desire. Immanuel Kant was a philosopher who lived the majority his vivification in the 1700s. He believed that an individual should use theology, freedom, and immortality to be able to wage and attain the supreme good. He also believed in deontological ethics, meaning it is ones obligation and duty to do what is right. Kant express that an individual must use intellect, free will, and reason to stock out this duty.He is similar to Aristotle because likewise, he believed that it is ideal for all people to act in an ethical manner by using reason. However, unlike Aristotle, Kant believed one must act ethically as an individual autonomy for the good of society.He said that one must use reason and free will to carry out ones duty and moral obligation to do good. He stressed the concept of not expecting to gain anything in reelect while performing ethical tasks even though one aptitude not like it one should act ethically out of the probity in ones heart. On the other hand, Aristotle believed one should act ethically as part of a community based on politics. He also expected a benefit in return, reprobate to Kant.Aristotle said that it is ideal to achieve a reasonable means in ethics, and he expected to gain something like happiness for instance in return. Also, contrary to Aristotles theory, Kants theory proposes that it is not very thinkable to achieve the supreme good in ones lifetime. He suggested that humans must achieve this good in a life after death. This proves that their theories regarding how to achieve the supreme good differ considerably. Emmanuel Levinas was a Judaic philosopher of the 20th century. He observed that the West focused on the iodin of Beings, not the Hebrew infinity.The Hebrew Infinity focuses on uniqueness and indication of things which gives them identity. Levinas based his ethics on this concept. Levinas believed one encounters the good or deity in all individuals or in creation. He said one needs to recognize these marks, accept them, and respond to them. He talked about the quake of astonishment, which is a confront to f ace experience that touches one deeply. Additionally, he suggested that the face of the stranger (the Other) demands that you recognize it and provide it hospitality. Thus, the face becomes ethical. He had this whole idea of promoting freedom rather than limiting it.He believed that the face is a trace of God that refuses to use power. Instead, the face calls one to be responsible by humbly beckoning those that passes by. Kant also had similar theories as Levinas because both of them emphasized that God is necessary for a person to act ethically. In other words, they include God in their search for the good. Kant believed one cannot do this without God, whereas Levinas believed humans are motivated by God to do good. With the concept of the Other, Levinas suggested that humans return a responsibility to respond with warmth and compassion.Similarly, Kant also believed in caring and compassion because he believed in the Universal Law if it is an act that is good for everyone, then i t is good for an individual. It is evident that Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas were three philosophers who sorted out various ethical approaches that aided them in their search for the good. Despite the fact that they bemuse several similar theories, each philosopher has many unique theories that will stretch forth to help future generations learn to live ethically and to ultimately achieve the greater good.