Gaunilo's argument from Anselm's point of view Essay

Gaunilos demarcation from Anselms point of view - Essay ExampleGaunilo, a fellow monk and believer sought to react Anselms aim, saying it would force people to conclude existence of other non- existent things. His critic is ordinarily described by philosophers as an overload idea, be arouse he does not show how Anselms ideas argon harm but rather how it unsound in all applications, if it is unsound in one. Gaunilo argues that god in the argument placed by Anselm can be replaced by anything, in his case, the perfect island. Suppose we replace idol with an island, this is how it would flow. Imagine a perfect island of which none like it is conceivable, now this idea exists in your mind. The existence of a perfect island in both the mind and in reality is greater than if it only exists in the mind. If the supposition of a perfect island exists in the mind then we can imagine an island better than the perfect island. and we cannot imagine an island greater than this we can conclu de that this perfect island exists. In defense of his hypothesis, Anselm would argue that the idea of what entails a perfect island varies from one person to another, for example, to me, a perfect island would be one with sandy beaches and human occupation, piece of music to another that would be one that is deserted and with abundance of lets say fruits. ... In the aid way he argues that no object can create itself, therefore there must be a first reason (God), who began the chain of existence of all things. Aquinas reconciled faith and reason, by borrowing heavily from Aristotle. The second cause is explained using the following steps 1) The natural world has things that are caused by other things. at that place is therefore an order of efficient causes in the sore world. Every sensible event that takes place has a distinct cause. 2) In the natural world, nothing can be the cause of itself. There is hardly a case in which an event in the natural world was caused by itself. E vents occur that were caused by events rate than themselves. 3) In the natural world there cannot be an endless cosmic string of objects causing other objects to exist. We can therefore say that causes are preceded by effects. 4) There exists a sorcerous being that causes the first chain of events therefore the cause of such events is called God. The supernatural force has to be a person with immense power and with divine attributes such as being omnipresent. These inferences are drawn from genius and causation. This argument has some flaws for example the identity of the cause does not have to be God. It is flawed to wear that the cause of the events that take place in nature has to originate from one location for all of them. There is a possibility that there may be multiple causes, not related to each other. Moreover, the cause does not have to be supernatural, but could be other causes such as the universe. In conclusion, this theory begs the question as to why infinite caus al chains are impossible, for example it can be assumed that there exists no beginning, middle or end time, therefore the