Saturday, April 13, 2019
Sanlu milk powder Essay Example for Free
Sanlu milk powder EssayConsequentialism, as its name suggests, is the view that prescriptive properties depend only on consequences. This general approach can be applied at unlike levels to different normative properties of different kinds of things, but the most prominent example is consequentialism about the moral probity of acts, which holds that whether an act is morally right depends only on the consequences of that act or of roughlything related to that act, such as the motive behind the act or a general rule requiring acts of the same kind. Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the proper course of action is the one that maximizes utility, usually be as maximizing total benefit and reducing suffering or the negatives. It also makes classic utileism slip to attack from many angles. Persistent opponents posed plenty of problems for classic utilitarianism. Each objection led some utilitarians to give up some of the original claims of classic utilit arianism.By dropping one or more than of those claims, descendants of utilitarianism can construct a wide variety of moral theories. Advocates of these theories often call them consequentialism quite an than utilitarianism so that their theories will not be subject to refutation by association with the classic utilitarian theory. Corporate social responsibility (CSR) Corporate social responsibility (CSR), also known as integrated responsibility, corporate citizenship, responsible business, sustainable responsible business (SRB), or corporate social per act uponance, is a form of corporate self-regulation integrated into a business model.Milton Friedman and others corroborate argued that a corporations purpose is to maximize returns to its sh atomic number 18holders, and that since only battalion can have social responsibilities, corporations are only responsible to their shareholders and not to society as a whole. They assert that corporations have no other obligation to societ y. (Freeman, 1984) Corporate social responsibility (CSR) essentially requires companies to top business beyond compliance with the law and beyond shareholder wealth maximization.It suggests that companies should do more than they are obligated under applicable laws governing product safety, environmental protection, labor rights, human rights, community development, corruption, and so on it also suggests that companies should consider not only the interests of shareholders but also those of other stakeholders (e. g. , employees, consumers, suppliers, and local communities). CSR requires companies to put up not only the quantity of goods, services, and employment but also the quality of life for those whose interests are modify by corporate activities. (Carroll, 2008).Facing the challenge, in order to protect and expand the market, on one stack improve the Sanlu milk purchase cost, on the other hand, through the continuous low harms, unfair disputation and reduce the product qu ality. At the same time, Sanlu Company launched the infant formula milk powder or occupation of the rural market, adding excipient, is as high as 40%. If the production in accordance with subject area quality standards efforts not only profits, but also serious losses.Vicious competition led to price higher than the cost, one of the value and price inversion phenomenon is the direct cause of Sanlu milk powder incident. (Wu, 2007) reconsideration of Corporate Social Responsibility by Sanlu Milk Incident Ethic problems in Sanlu Incident have the following aspects (1) Ethic relationship between the enterprise and the government (2) Ethic relationship between the enterprise and the competitors (3) Ethic relationship between the enterprise and the consumers (4) Ethic relationship among the enterprise, consumers, and government. The analysis is made step by step as follows.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.