Constitution vs Articles of Confederation Essay

As one of the creators of the bare-ass shaping of 1788, you are elect to present its strengths as compared to the weaknesses of the Articles of compact. What areas of importance will you stress in attempting to father it passed unanimously?Give good considerably-reasoned arguments in a report of slightly 400 words. You will need to research the details of each document, victimization resources from the library, the Internet, or other sources. Be sure to use proper recite and grammar.Articles of ConfederationThe Articles of Confederation were a written engagement, ratified by the thirteen original conjures of the United States of the States, which laid the guidelines as to how the US politics was say to function. Sometimes, simply referred to as Articles, this agreement was created in November 1777, and ratified by the 13 original commonwealths in March 1781. Within a few historic period of its ratification, it was subjected to severe animadversion by the Founding Father s of the United States. Eventu bothy, it was decided that this agreement had to be fiatd to suit the needs of the nation as a whole. In May 1787, delegates from the 13 call downs met in Philadelphia to revise the Articles of Confederation. However, in die hard of convention all the delegation members came to a mutual conclusion that revising the entire Constitution was better than revising the existing Articles of the Confederation.The US ConstitutionThe US Constitution, which is considered to be the supreme law in the United States of America today, is an agreement which provides the guidelines for the organization of the United States government, i.e. the federal official official government, and its relationship with various states and citizens of the country. Basically, the legion(predicate) problems with the Articles laid the foundation for a new paper. When the delegates from all the thirteenstates met to revise the Articles of Confederation, they came to a mutual conclus ion that drafting a new constitution was much viable option than revising the existing one which was expert of problems. The delegates involved in the Philadelphia Convention, where the new US Constitution was drafted, included nigh of the prominent names of the American history including James Madison, George Washington, William Pierce and asa dulcis Franklin.Articles of Confederation vs. the US ConstitutionIf you try to compare the Articles with the new Constitution, you discharge that the former was full of drawbacks, while the latter had answers to all these drawbacks. The Articles was subjected to severe criticism for the very fact that it centralized all the powers in the hands of state government, and left the national government with no major powers at all. As opposed to the unicameral system which was facilitated by the Articles of Confederation, the US Constitution introduced the two-chambered system of governance, which was divided into the upper house and lower hous e. Yet some other difference between the two was pertaining to the number of votes each state had. plot of land the Articles had a provision of one vote for every single state irrespective of its size, the US Constitution had the provision of one vote per model or senator.Similarly, the new Constitution also do provision for decision maker and judiciary branches of the government, something which the Articles of Confederation didnt facilitate. When the Articles were the supreme law of the land, the national government required approval from 9 of the total 13 states to pass new laws. This was also changed in the new Constitution wherein approval of more than half of the total nominees of the states is enough to pass new laws. In order to recreate the constitution, the national government required unanimous approval from all the 13 states. As per the new law though, the number was changed and only 2/ tertiary of the both houses and 3/4th of state legislatures was enough to amen d the Constitution. This made the task of amending very easy, and the 27 amendments to the US Constitution highlight this very fact very well.The federal courts were not in picture when the Articles of Confederation was the supreme law. But when the US Constitution was introduced, it did feature provision for federal courts, which were assigned the responsibility of resolving disputes between the citizens as well as the states. While the Articles didnt give the national government the right to bill taxes on its citizens, the Constitution did give the federal government the powers to do so. Similarly, the federal government required approval from the states to raise an legions as per the stipulations of the Articles. consort to the Constitution, on the other hand, the federal government has the right to raise an army to deal with conflict situations. The Articles didnt allow any interference on the part of the federal government in terms of regulation of take and commerce, but th e US Constitution gave the federal government the right to watch trade and commerce at the international level as well as the inter-state level.The new Constitution was drafted because the Articles of Confederation, which preceded it, didnt live up to the expectations. The states were doubtlessly happy as they were in command, with the national government having no enforcing leave whatsoever, but this left the United States of America in a state of chaos with each state coming up with its own laws. With all this chaos, the US Constitution was surely the need of the hour.